Research Paper
The Architecture of Human Identity
A Four-Layer Diagnostic Framework for Understanding Human Motivation
The Resonance Identity System
Diagnostic Assessment Framework v8.0
Key Statistics
Abstract
The Resonance Identity System presents a comprehensive framework for understanding human motivation, organizing identity into four fundamental orientations: Transcendence (meaning, legacy, sacred), Agency (achievement, impact, creation), Belonging (connection, love, tribe), and Integrity (standards, principles, excellence).
The framework emerged from an unprecedented collaboration between four leading AI systems - Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic), GPT-5.1 Thinking (OpenAI), Gemini 3.0 (Google), and Grok 4 (xAI) - who independently converged on the same four-dimensional model of human motivation.
Human motivation is modeled as a point in a 4-dimensional probability simplex where T + B + A + I = 1.0, enabling precise positioning among 50 distinct archetypes (the Golden 50) distributed asymmetrically across the four orientations (T:12, B:13, A:15, I:10). Internal validation testing achieved up to 97.1% overall accuracy with near-perfect primary orientation detection in test scenarios.
Key Findings
The Four-Layer Architecture
The Resonance Identity System organizes human identity into four interconnected layers:
Layer 1: Base
T/B/A/I Tetrahedron positioning and 50 archetypes (the Golden 50)
Layer 2: Diagnostic
Activation Capacity, Identity Layer Divergence, Signal Weighting
Layer 3: Dynamic
Integration Efficiency, Expression Modes, Growth Paths
Layer 4: Shadow
Shadow orientation, type (Neglect vs. Wound), defense mechanisms
The Golden 50 Archetypes
The framework captures nuance through 50 distinct archetypes distributed asymmetrically:
Validation Results
The framework was validated through rigorous testing with 16 diverse persona assessments:
Signal Evidence Weighting
A key finding: behavioral evidence predicts orientation more reliably than stated values. The system uses adaptive weighting based on detected self-awareness:
Behavioral Signals
- - Time/energy allocation patterns
- - Trade-off choices under constraint
- - Life trajectory patterns
- - Weight: 55-85% (adaptive)
Stated Signals
- - Explicit self-report values
- - Aspirational claims
- - Self-descriptions
- - Weight: 15-45% (adaptive)
Methodology Overview
AI Collaboration Process
Four leading AI systems - Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic), GPT-5.1 Thinking (OpenAI), Gemini 3.0 (Google), and Grok 4 (xAI) - were brought together to analyze human motivation. Despite different architectures, training data, and organizational objectives, they independently converged on the same four-dimensional model. Claude Opus 4.5 served as lead author, with GPT-5.1, Gemini 3.0, and Grok 4 as peer reviewers. Mauricio facilitated the collaboration, ensuring the framework remained grounded in real human experience.
Assessment Protocol
The assessment consists of a 45-minute voice conversation that reveals orientation through the natural patterns of what you prioritize and how you make decisions.
What We Analyze
- - Content of your responses
- - Values revealed through conversation
- - Decision-making patterns
- - Life trajectory and energy allocation
What We Do NOT Analyze
- - Acoustic features
- - Voice patterns or prosody
- - Tone of voice
- - Speaking speed or pitch
Integration Analysis
Approximately 2-5% of adults achieve genuine integration across all four orientations. The framework specifically detects and validates this rare developmental achievement through variance analysis, distinguishing true integration from undifferentiated identity or defensive balance patterns.
Full Research Paper
The complete technical specification including mathematical foundations, archetype catalog, assessment protocols, and clinical guidelines is available for download.
Experience the Framework
Join the waitlist to be among the first to experience the TABI framework through a 45-minute voice conversation with AI.
Join the Waitlist